User talk:Nirmal Dulal

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nirmal Dulal!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Nirmal Dulal, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Nirmal Dulal, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Solution for the image: File:Gomphrena globosa Single.JPG

Hello. You are the photographer of the image File:Gomphrena globosa Single.JPG. I'm not sure if the image was edited or not. If so, I suggest you clear the image blurs and not have to be very sharp and without noise. The field is very blurred ago. With the reform of image, intend to nominate it again in FP. If you do not like, leave anyway. Thanks. ArionEstar (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 11 November, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:30 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, WLM 2017 in Nepal Team

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal — Invitation

		Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal
		Hi Nirmal Dulal, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2018 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2018. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address. Kind regards, The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Nirmal Dulal,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal

Hi Nirmal Dulal, The e-mail address of nepaliwiki at googlegroups.com in the Contact us sectionat Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal is not working, I got an error back.

At the moment I only know of this page as the landing page for Wiki Loves Monuments in Nepal. As Nepali is the local language, I hope there will be a page in Nepali too? Greetings - Romaine (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Romaine, Greetings!! I corrected the contact email. also created a landing page in Nepali language and added the link in this page. We will also translate that page in Nepali ASAP. Thanks - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bigbell of Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tusha Hiti (Golden Tap) of Patan, Lalitpur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilancho (South Face).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but there are artifacts on the sky, maybe from too strong jpeg compression. also the verticals need a slight perspective correction --Trougnouf 17:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)  Done Corrected. -- Nirmal Dulal 06:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syambhunath 2018-09 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhandarkhal Pokhari (Kamal Pokhari).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of Krisnna Temple, Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WLM 2018 Nepal Photowalk 09-29 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:20, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nepali hindu bride.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syambhunath 2018-09 (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aethopyga siparaja seheriae Panchkhal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhupatindra Malla 2018-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krisnna Temple and Garuda at Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:50, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Name should be in the description, otherwise good quality. --Peulle 07:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)  Done Name added. -- Nirmal Dulal 10:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

VI

Hi, I have noticed that you support all nominations by User:Nabin K. Sapkota, also from Nepal, without much respect for VI criteria and rules. Please stop doing that. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Yann if you look there carefully you can find that I only supported some among his Nominations, not The all of them, And I supported his nominations as per Quote from Commons:Valued images: "Valued images, on the other hand, are those that are the most valuable of their kind for use in an online context, within other Wikimedia projects", I only supported those Images which were used and useful, and its done with good faith.I respect the Criteria and Rules of VI. —- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Not really. Please read the rules again. Images need to be geocoded, and have a valuable scope. That's not the case for several of your supports. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doko 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in Scope

Hi Nirmal Dulal, I made changes in Scope here please, review it again. Thanks and regards! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:34, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in VI (Scope)

Hi Nirmal Dulal, I made changes in Scope here please, review it again. Thanks and regards! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in VI (Scope)

Hi Charlesjsharp, I made changes in Scope here please, review it again. Thanks and regards! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 02:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arjun Kumar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Picture is tilted, easy to fix. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done - fixed, Thanks. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nepalese children reading books in Nepali..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose The scope is too broad, and you have actually two different scopes. How are children reading a book more representative of poverty in Nepal than, say, a photograph of a homeless man, or of a houshold? Skimel (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Skimel: I think you didn't check the reason, this picture showing affect of Poverty in Education in Nepal. this is not a picture of homeless people, its a picture of some poor children reading used books in their home. Can you suggest me better scope for this? Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support I think the picture shows the relevant scope of poverty as the enthusiast childrens are studying the used books despite of having purchasising capacity - Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 04:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The idea is generous but Skimel is right --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: - If you think The scope is too broad then Can you suggest better scope for this? I can correct it. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Comment The images of this type are very difficult to label for VI. The specificity of the scope is a real problem. There are many images of this type in COMMNONS distributed in several categories. Why is this one more emblematic than the others? For my part I do not believe that we can label it but the discussion is open to other points of view and ideas. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done I made little change in scope. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 07:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Sorry, it's not obvious to a viewer that the children are poor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

You can oppose but if you look picture carefully, (ie. Check thair dresses) you can see the poverty. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

The younger girl's dress is dirty, but maybe she played in the dirt. It's not obvious to me. I lived in Malaysia in the mid 1970s, when it was an upper-tier developing country. Most of my neighbors were poor, but if you get my meaning, that was normal poverty, and therefore, not notable. And I used lots of used textbooks in public school here in New York, not because my family was poor (they were middle-income) but because the school system was shortchanged in funding. There's a lot of hidden poverty. Most musicians in New York are poor, but many of us own suits or formal dresses as professional clothing, so how would you be able to tell by looking at us that we're poor? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment Even if the children are in a poor household, they appear to be having a broad education - if you look carefully, the book that they are reading depicts the Star of David. Martinvl (talk) 08:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

this sign is called Shatkona in Nepal. if you look carefully, you can see the book written in Nepali Language.- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Then maybe a good scope would be "Nepalese children reading books in Nepalese" ? Skimel (talk) 09:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done - Thanks Skimel for suggestion, I made changes in scope. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - With so many people voting and commenting and with such a major change in scope, it's important to follow the standard procedure to inform everyone of the scope change. If you go into edit mode, I think you will see instructions above your screen telling you how to do it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for not following procedure, Now I followed that. Thanks Ikan Kekek for informing. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

----

Scope changed from Affect of poverty in Education in Nepal to Nepalese children reading books in Nepali. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment - Thanks for going through the procedure. I think File:Grade 3 at Shree Sahara Bal Primary School, Pokhara, Nepal. (10698962134).jpg is the clearest example of a child reading a Nepali-language book. I'm not sure what we want to do with the scope of this photo now, because the difference is that these children are not in a school uniform and not at school, and they are sharing a book (not necessarily both reading, as the younger one at the moment seems to be looking at the Shatkona, which her sister is pointing at). I think this is a useful photo, but I'm not sure what the best scope would be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment It is an emotional image, but it can not be the emblem of education in Nepal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment @Nirmal Dulal: Quote from Commons:Valued images: "Valued images, on the other hand, are those that are the most valuable of their kind for use in an online context, within other Wikimedia projects". Can you suggest which specific Wikipedia articles/projects would benefit from these photographs and align the scope with those [potential] articles/projects? Martinvl (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@Martinvl: - Please look here for use of this file on other other Wikimedia projects. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment I would support with the new scope if geolocation is provided. --Yann (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done- @Yann: added, thanks - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

 Support OK now. Yann (talk) 08:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

 Support per Yann, the new scope is OK. Skimel (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

 Support - support after changes in scope -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 04:35, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - I would remind everyone that when a scope is changed, opposing votes from before are still in force. And I can confirm that I still oppose, because (a) it's unclear the children are actually reading at the moment: instead, the older sister is pointing to the Shatkona and the others are looking at that symbol, which is not quite the same as reading; (b) there is another photo, albeit showing one child reading a book in Nepali, that I consider better in scope. Not every worthwhile photo has a suitable VI scope. I think this one doesn't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fisheye view of Chilancho.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The category is plethoric, it would be good to cut it into several categories. The image is tilted it could be straightened. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done - Corrected. Thanks ! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

The scope should be restricted to this monument. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done - I corrected the scope. Thanks! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - If this is the only photo on Commons of Chilancho, then of course it's best in scope. I assume you checked and made sure it was the only one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

There are some more of it by me and two other Nepali Wikipedian.But I think this is a picture of an Historical Monument which is built in 1515 AD. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

----

Scope changed from Cultural heritage monuments in Nepal to Chilancho --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support> I changed the outline of the image. It's good for me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Nirmal Dulal, please make sure all pictures of this monument are visible in the gallery for the category. It's important for us to see every image of this monument and judge which one seems best in scope to us. I would of course respect your judgment on which of your own photos is best, but I should still be able to see them all and make my own judgment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done I did my best. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you, much appreciated. Yes, this seems to be the most useful photo, because it shows an overview. However, it has that curvy distortion. It's probably best to indicate what type of projection (fisheye?) was used in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Ikan Kekek is right the distorted image does not give an accurate idea of the building, they are useful and the term fisheye should be sytematic for this type of image.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

it’s not taken with “fisheye”, its a panoramic shot taken with IPhone. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

I have an Android, not an IPhone, so I ask you: When you set an IPhone to "panorama", does it automatically create a curve where one isn't there in real life? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

I think yes. Does android took straight shots on panoramic mood??- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 12:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

I think so, but I haven't tried that mode much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

The term “fisheye” is very suitable whatever the technique. You have to change the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

----

Scope changed from Chilancho to Fisheye view of Chilancho -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:55, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support this time no problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brides of Nepal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose - This shows a picture of a bride only, not a wedding. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done - Corrected. Nirmal Dulal (talk) 12:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support now that the scope has been updated, the image is relevant and useful. Skimel (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Skimel. Thanks for fixing the cope, Nirmal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 09:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think the scope is suitable. Too broad. Charles (talk) 14:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dandi and Biyo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• For a scope, perhaps dandi and biyo? Because what's being shown is not the game in action but the tools of the game. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Ikan Kekek  Done corrected, thanks. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Dandi Biyo to Dandi and Biyo --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - I didn't realize that had its own category! Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Bhupatindra Malla at Bhaktapur Durbar Square..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:30, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kumari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 09:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doko (basket).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Geocoding would be welcome --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done - geolocation added. thanks -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

 Comment - The scope should be simply "Doko". Explanation is presumably available in the Wikipedia article where this is used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that I corrected your scope. I think this kind of simple scope correction doesn't require a new vote. Archaeodontosaurus, are you in agreement with the simplified scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The idea seems good initially but there are three cities in the world called Doko. The first scope allowed to have no problem. It can be solved as did the article in English by adding (Basket). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

agree with Archaeodontosaurus, there are some cities which have same name (Doko), Thats why I put “Nepali hand made equipment to carry goods” for clarification. —- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 08:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

I'm OK with adding "(basket)" to the scope, but the description was in my opinion too long for what's needed to disambiguate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 15 December, 2018 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, WLM 2018 in Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wedding cake-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Discussion about QI assessment of one of your images

It’s about this image

Hello Nirmal Dulal,

just in case you may have not noticed yet, I just want to give you a hint that there is some discussion about the Quality Image assessment of one of your photographs: please see here.

As far as I can see, the most important point is the perspective. While your photo is very nice in itself, the rules for Quality Images normally require a perspective correction for photographs of buildings, i.e. making all straight lines appear straight. This is best done right in the raw image file conversion process, i.e. in your case in Lightroom. Have you a raw image file for this photograph, i.e. a CRW/CR2/CR3 file? Could you try to create a variant of this photograph with lens and perspective correction applied? (I would suggest to upload it as a separate image with a new file name, because the current version of your photograph has made such success in WLM and should IMHO not be overridden. :–) Or, if you do not want to do this yourself, in the discussion Hans-Jürgen Neubert has already offered to create an improved version for you, and I can can offer the same (i.e., I can try to create a version of your photo which complies to the suggestions given in the QI discussion). It would only be necessary that you could send the CRW/CR2/CR3 file to me or a version converted into DNG file format to Hans-Jürgen Neubert …

No offence, I just want to help a bit. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Aristeas: thanks for help, I just did the nominations, I’m not the author and uploader. I’ll try to reach to the real author for this and let you know soon. Thanks again for your help and notification. —- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Oops, sorry that I missed this! Thank you for pointing this out! I have therefore copied my message (as given above) to the discussion page of the author and uploader of the image.

However, it is a good idea that you try to reach the real author, too. You have already successfully nominated quite some photographs for Quality Images; maybe you can give some hints to the real author about the QI procedure and requirements …

Thank you and best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bisket Jatra festival 2018 at the Nyatapola temple, Bhaktapur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - December - Cakes/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Wedding cake-2018.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Cakes, in December 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aegithalos concinnus Black-throated bushtit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment this image is better. Charles (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Barbet (Megalaima virens) (न्याउली).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuculus micropterus Indian cuckoo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - The spelling is "cuckoo". I mention this because you also should change your file description and request a filename change after this nomination is over. I have yet to look at other photos in the gallery to determine how I should vote but wanted to mention that spelling issue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Actually, it's obvious from thumbnails that this photo is best in scope. But please make the corrections you can make now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done Spelling corrected and requested to rename - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done geo location added, thanks. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 19:26, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niltava macgrigoriae Female small niltava.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best image and good crop. Charles (talk) 14:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turdoides nipalensis Spiny Babbler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Much better, thanks Charles (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phaenicophaeus tristis Green-billed malkoha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psilopogon virens magnificus Great barbet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Would this be subspecies magnificus? Charles (talk) 09:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

I think yes. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support useful, though if you have software to lighten shadows, that would help. Charles (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dayahang Rai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question why not the studio portrait? Charles (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

I think it is better, with Geo location and studio portrait don't has meta data too.-- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga siparaja Crimson sunbird (female).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but note rule #3 under "Image page requirements" above: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name". When this image has a meaningful file name, I will support. -- Ikan Kekek 05:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Thanks Ikan Kekek, I requested for renaming. - Nirmal Dulal 06:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Done- Nirmal Dulal 09:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Female Mallard Swimming.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Wiki Loves Earth 2019/ne

hello! please, if you can, check the text in the template. i have copied from the previous year, i want to make sure i have not ruined anything... thank you! --アンタナナ 11:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Antanana, I made little correction, but you did a good job. Thank you!! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul जुल्फे जुरेली.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul (Pycnonotus leucogenys) जुल्फे जुरेली.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A somewhat unfortunate cut-out. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Cree_panta_bird_32.jpg

Target name already exist, please pick another name.--Aldnonymous^Bicara? 06:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Done - 06:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House Sparrow (Passer rutilans) in Nepal by kiran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-wattled lapwing (Vanellus indicus) 2019 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted bunting), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is a marked sexual dimorphism for this species it is necessary to reduce the scope to "Male". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Emberiza aureola - Yellow-breasted bunting to Emberiza aureola - Yellow-breasted bunting (Male) --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 03:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I made change in scope, Thanks for comment. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfcet now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimson sunbird female (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian Grassbird Wiki Loves Birds Nepal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graminicola bengalensis (Indian grassbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus traillii traillii (Maroon oriole).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great cormorant in Nepal 2019 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green billed Malkoha (Nepal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moahim 10:50, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Wattled lapwing Vanellus Indicus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House Sparrow (Passer rutilans) 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SH6188 12:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oriental White Eye (Zosterops palpebrosus) 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea, Nepal 19 cm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 08:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Arial view of Pokhara 03.jpg

This is a very nice picture, but I noticed it looks to be highly compressed. Do you shoot in RAW? If so, you may want to check your JPG compression settings. (a 24 MP picture should be much larger than 2.45 MP). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  03:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Rhododendrites, I shot it in RAW. Sorry to say, I tried searching in my backup but didn't find the RAW file (just found a converted JPG with 6.56 MB size). Thanks and Regards -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Ah. Oh well. Well nice job on the image, regardless. I suspect if it were processed differently, it might be a good FP candidate. In case you find the RAW someday. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-bearded Bee-eater मधुमक्षी भक्षका.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon oriole - Bird from Nepal by Krishna (107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oriental turtle dove in Nepal (79).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-bearded Bee-eater मधुमक्षी भक्षका.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon oriole - Bird from Nepal by Krishna (107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-throated Barbet (कुथुर्के).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 16:04, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus), Nepal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 10:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-wattled lapwing (Vanellus indicus) 2019 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syambhunath 2018-09 (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 10:29, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dicaeum ignipectus (Fire-breasted flowerpecker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. What is Campaign:wlbirds please Nirmal Dulal? Charles (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Charles this photo is from Wiki Loves Birds. :) --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 15:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

 Comment What a brilliant project Nirmal. I'm coming with my wife and cameras to Nepal 9-22 November this year. I will mail you! Charles (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure, I'll be happy to see you here brother. Regards - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saras crane by Sanjay Tha Shrestha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated Laughingthrush (82).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shikra (Accipiter badius) 2019 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wedge-tailed green pigeon (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimson sunbird female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Striated laughingthrush 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nepali hindu bride.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepali hindu bride.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Under stars and snows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow-breasted bunting in Nepal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Charlesjsharp 09:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tricoloured munia (Lonchura malacca) in Nepal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 01:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (61).jpg

And also:

• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (60).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (59).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (58).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (57).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (56).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (54).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (55).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (52).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (51).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (53).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (36).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (48).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (37).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (47).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (45).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (46).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (44).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (42).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (43).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (41).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (40).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (39).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (38).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (35).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (34).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (33).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (32).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (31).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (30).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (29).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (28).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (27).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (25).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (26).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (24).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (23).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (22).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (20).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (21).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (19).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (17).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (18).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (16).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (15).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (13).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (14).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (12).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (10).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (11).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (9).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (8).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (7).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (6).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (4).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (5).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (3).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (1).jpg
• File:Wikimedians of Nepal Event 2018-06-24 (2).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (31).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (34).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (32).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (33).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (30).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (29).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (25).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (27).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (24).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (23).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (22).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (21).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (20).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (17).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (18).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (16).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (14).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (15).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (12).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (10).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (9).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (1).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (6).jpg
• File:Pankaj Deo at Wikimedia Conference 2018.jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (8).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (7).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (5).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (4).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (3).jpg
• File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (2).jpg
• File:Metropolitan Police Office of Nepal.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations

---

Hello Nirmal Dulal. You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Mr Tulsi Bhagat the name "Babin" in Exif metadata of these picture is name of my nephew "Babin Dulal" which was given by myself in there and for your kind information that is my personal camera and I think most of the participants on these event know that I was using that camera and don't try to hide your mistakes doing this mess up here. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enicurus schistaceus (slaty-backed forktail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Thanks for crop. useful. Charles (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuculus micropterus (Indian cuckoo).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good but , we must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

 Done -Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I added the geo location, thanks. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 28 September, 2019 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, WLM 2019 in Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal
		Dear Nirmal Dulal, Please disregard our previous message about Felicitation of WLM. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 28 September, 2019 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, WLE 2019 in Nepal Team

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

---

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Nirmal Dulal,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

-- ~riley (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Visit to Nepal

Hi. Just back from our travels and starting to upload a few images every day. It was great connecting with Mikimedia/Wikipedia Nepal and we are so grateful for all the time you and Nabin spent with us. I think the work that Nabin and colleagues have done on the monuments of Kathmandu is incredible. Good luck with all your projects. Charles (talk) 15:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Charles, it was really nice to meet a great commons contributor like you. hope you enjoyed your tour. we also aspect help from user like you for our projects. Hope to see you again in Nepal. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagar Pun.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Nirmal Dulal,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lalit Bhandari, Nepali Cricketer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

		The Nepal Barnstar of National Merit
		For your hard work in uploading many images from Nepal and for your hospitality to a visiting Commons user. Charles (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Just put my first FP nomination from Nepal. Charles (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Nirmal Dulal,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dicaeum ignipectus (Fire-breasted flowerpecker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. What is Campaign:wlbirds please Nirmal Dulal? Charles (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Charles this photo is from Wiki Loves Birds. :) --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 15:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

 Comment What a brilliant project Nirmal. I'm coming with my wife and cameras to Nepal 9-22 November this year. I will mail you! Charles (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure, I'll be happy to see you here brother. Regards - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Not as good as the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC) - I was uncomfortable with some of the arguments, so I did a web search. Gray feathers seem to be a minority variant, but I do believe this photo is oversaturated, and the background is surely more distracting than the other photo. If we get a better photo with blue feathers, we can have a Most Valuable Review. For now, I'm going back to opposing this photo and supporting the other. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The upperside of the birds is metallic blue --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Altogether more vibrant an image, with a more interesting background. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment A "more interesting background" is a negative for VI, not a positive. Charles (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment That's your opinion. Mine differs. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

• I agree with him. Hear me out: The point of a VI is to represent a scope as clearly as possible. A distracting background decreases the clarity of the depiction of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

• I agree with the principle, but the point here is that I am not distracted by the background. Should all backgrounds be bland? I doubt it. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

• Not if they're integral to the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

 1. Commons: Valued image candidates/Dicaeum ignipectus Nepal by Krishna (cropped).jpg: +3<--
 2. Commons: Valued image candidates/Fire-breasted flowerpecker (Dicaeum ignipectus ignipectus) male Phulchowki.jpg:  +1
=>
1. File:Dicaeum ignipectus Nepal by Krishna (cropped).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--

2. File: Fire-breasted flowerpecker (Dicaeum ignipectus ignipectus) male Phulchowki.jpg :promoted

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Wikimania 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (16).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Way to everest base camp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pheriche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amazing Sunset of Pheriche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pheriche Village of Nepal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very beautiful image and very useful, but it lacks geocoding in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Archaeodontosaurus for comment, geo location added now. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Hello again Nirmal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Amazing Sunset of Pheriche.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amazing Sunset of Pheriche.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Nirmal_Dulal,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

WLM Invitation

		Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Nepal
		Hi Nirmal Dulal, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Nepal competition during 1 September to 30 September, 2020 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. Kind regards, The Wiki Loves Monuments Team, Nepal

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swayambhunath temple - an ancient religious architecture of Nepal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tapari.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Nirmal Dulal,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Nirmal_Dulal,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:House sparrow feeding behaviour.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:House sparrow feeding behaviour.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Swayambhunath temple - an ancient religious architecture of Nepal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swayambhunath temple - an ancient religious architecture of Nepal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Skimmer (Dragonfly) mating in air.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skimmer (Dragonfly) mating in air.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ochotona macrotis - (Large-eared pika).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done Corrected -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Northern pintail at Taudaha Kathmandu.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Northern pintail at Taudaha Kathmandu.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Bug Peek.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bug Peek.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) 6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) 6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Nirmal Dulal,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo Nirmal Dulal,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 Nepal banner

Hi Nirmal Dulal, I noticed you added the design for the Wiki Loves Earth banner on the page Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2023/CentralNotice. The design you created is sadly not possible in the CentralNotice system in the form it is right now (and also not for the other countries with a similar design proposal). With a simple banner it is only possible to have only one image in the right side and only one image on the left side. If you wish a more complex banner with multiple images, a design like this is then an option (with in the center a wide central image). If you wish to use a complex design, you need to create the central image which measures 8.000 × 1.000 pixels. Otherwise it will be the simple design. Then please change the design by removing the images so only one remains on on side. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Romaine: please check this image as per your requirement. and hope you can use text from the template I already requested. Thank you!! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Nirmal Dulal, Implemented! Just one thing for next time: if you create an image out of other images, please make sure you mention all the images used on the file page. I searched now for the images and added them to the file page, but that is normally something the uploader should do. Otherwise you may face the risk that the image gets deleted because of copyright issues. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 03:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:GreatCormorant.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GreatCormorant.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elaphe hodgsoni (Hodgson's rat snake) - juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Although the tail is missing, there is no better one at the moment. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)  Comment Archaeodontosaurus might suggest a more limited scope, e.g. a crop and adding head Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Indeed the scope could be reduced, but the category is poor and there is little competition. As it is, it's acceptable.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 09:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tufted Duck कालीजुरे हाँस.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tufted Duck कालीजुरे हाँस.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:House sparrow Nepal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:House sparrow Nepal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Black kite impersonating an osprey.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black kite impersonating an osprey.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hoverfly in rain by prasan shrestha.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoverfly in rain by prasan shrestha.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Birds 2024

Hi Nirmal Dulal, I see you requested an update of the upload campaign, but I do not understand why you didn't just talk to me? The banner is now ready to use. If you have any questions, please let me know. Romaine (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Romaine, I sent an email to you but I didn't get your response, So I thought you are busy. I will always remember you if needed. Thanks for supporting. Regards! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Nirmal Dulal, There is a big change coming in my private life resulting in that my had is not as clear as I normally wish it would be. I just found your e-mail, I had overlooked it. Anyway, your birds campaign is ready to go. Romaine (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grey-headed canary-flycatcher in Panchkhal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phylloscopus fuscatus (Dusky warbler).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myophonus caeruleus (Blue whistling thrush)- subspecies: M. c. temminckii- juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Hi Nirmal; good to see you here. this one might show the lack of spangling better, but if you include subspecies in scope, your's will be perfect. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Charles, Thanks for comment. I added subspecies as per your comment. Regards, - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gracupica contra (Indian pied myna) in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Esacus recurvirostris (Great stone-curlew) in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dryobates cathpharius (Crimson-naped woodpecker) - D. c. cathpharius - Female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Must specify sex and subspecies would be useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks @Charles, I did that.-- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga gouldiae (Mrs. Gould's sunbird) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

this image is nice. Nominated image would be big crop to show male. Female has little value. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Charles Thank you for being here. Can you fix this? or please suggest what to do. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

User Mildeep should crop this or if this is OK with him, you can download his image, crop it and upload the edited file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks ! I did that. hope it is okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Great Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga gouldiae (Mrs. Gould's sunbird) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

this image is nice. Nominated image would be big crop to show male. Female has little value. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Charles Thank you for being here. Can you fix this? or please suggest what to do. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

User Mildeep should crop this or if this is OK with him, you can download his image, crop it and upload the edited file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks ! I did that. hope it is okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Great Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga gouldiae (Mrs. Gould's sunbird) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

this image is nice. Nominated image would be big crop to show male. Female has little value. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Charles Thank you for being here. Can you fix this? or please suggest what to do. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

User Mildeep should crop this or if this is OK with him, you can download his image, crop it and upload the edited file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks ! I did that. hope it is okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Great Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga gouldiae (Mrs. Gould's sunbird) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

this image is nice. Nominated image would be big crop to show male. Female has little value. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Charles Thank you for being here. Can you fix this? or please suggest what to do. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

User Mildeep should crop this or if this is OK with him, you can download his image, crop it and upload the edited file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks ! I did that. hope it is okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Great Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga gouldiae (Mrs. Gould's sunbird) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

this image is nice. Nominated image would be big crop to show male. Female has little value. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Charles Thank you for being here. Can you fix this? or please suggest what to do. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

User Mildeep should crop this or if this is OK with him, you can download his image, crop it and upload the edited file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks ! I did that. hope it is okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Great Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carpodacus rodopeplus (Spot-winged rosefinch) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
• Yes, though crop would make more valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enicurus schistaceus (Slaty-backed forktail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but too dark Nirmal Dulal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Charles! corrected, Please check. Hope its okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomatorhinus ruficollis (Streak-breasted scimitar babbler).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gray-throated Babbler Cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dicrurus paradiseus (Greater racket-tailed drongo) - In flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prinia crinigera (Himalayan prinia) - ventral view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This frontal image does not show the colours of the back and wings which are important for identifying a bird. I suggest to modify the scope to "Prinia crinigera (Himalayan prinia) ventral view"

 Done Thank you. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarsiger indicus (White-browed bush robin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cacomantis passerinus (Gray-bellied Cuckoo) - female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stachyris nigriceps (Grey-throated babbler) - Sub. Sp.- S.n.nigriceps.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support cropped version. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support cropped version. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support cropped version. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support cropped version. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support cropped version. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted Bunting) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 07:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted Bunting) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 07:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcippe nipalensis (Nepal Fulvetta).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support useful and very used now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted Bunting) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 07:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcippe nipalensis (Nepal Fulvetta).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support useful and very used now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted Bunting) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 07:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cecropis daurica (Red Rumped Swallow) - in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Columba pulchricollis (Ashy Wood Pigeon).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• needs a crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thank you! -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Very Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

{subst:vicl

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niltava macgrigoriae (Small Nitava) - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apus nipalensis (House swift) in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Common kingfisher in flight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common kingfisher in flight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Red Rumped Swallow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Red Rumped Swallow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Milvus migrans (Black Kite) - Sub Sp. M. m. govinda - Juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slaty-backed Forktail cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)